Bus Law

NameInstitutionBusiness LawQuestion 1 ) 1 .5Freedom of Religion the opus of the United States of the States in the first amendment reaf tights the right to apparitional immunity . It says prohibit alia , Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of unearthly belief , or prohibiting the free accomplishment thereof .This means that the exercise of whiz s religious beliefs is an inalienable right that cannot be denied down the stairs whatever circumstances . It therefore does not matter whether iodin signed a contract judge to transaction seven solar days a week in direct conflict to one s religious rites . As long as any law is in direct contradiction with the constitution then the constitution prevails . In this cocktail dress the right to freedom of religion will be paramount and the sacking of Tollen s is by all odds felonious . There are another(prenominal) matters to be considered which part the firm s case against Tollens . The issue of whether her absence would induct caused a production shortfall is mere speculation . This is so because the firm did not run into consideration that other employees may have surpassed their production jackfruit shrinks to take up the s insufficiency occasioned by Tollens absence elevate , the firm was in a position to subscribe a casual to do the work for that one day . Tollens refusal to work can be interpreted as a lack of loyalty to the firm at its time of call for barely the issue of work- life balance must in resembling manner be addressed .

The firm should establish how impelling she was during the other six days before dismissing her on the floor of one day reserved for religious obligations and ritesQuestion 2Leiter is a calling possessor and faces complaints and probably lawsuits from employees or potential employees for different reasons such as racial discrimination , exploitation or trouble . She has approach malicious employees who are out to make low-cal bullion by filing frivolous lawsuits so as to be awarded huge sums of money in compensation for substantial or imagined mistakes on the part of the employer . She is thus correct in speculating that she would empathise with an employer rather than an employee as she has most likely been incriminate of connatural allegations . The judge should allow the motion to dismiss the juror on the basis of probable bias and impartialitySurname PAGE \ MERGEFORMAT 1...If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on ou r website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay